The 14th Amendment does not address the 'natural born citizen' issue, only citizenship. The 14th Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was proposed on June 13, 1866, and ratified on July 9, 1868, and was first intended to secure the rights of former slaves and it is one of the post-Civil War Reconstruction Amendments. The 14th amendment provides a broader definition of citizenship, overruling Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) which had excluded slaves and their descendants from possessing Constitutional rights.

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Actually that is not true.  Read what was actually stated.  On October 31, 2008, the statement from Hawaii's  Department of  Health Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino,  was carefully worded when she said, "She had  personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health had Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

The 5 things the Hawaiian Heath Director Fukino's statement did not answer are:

  1)  Was Obama physically born in Hawaii? It seems this question was not answered deliberately. A fact to consider is that Hawaii allows registration of foreign births.

Sun Yat-sen was born on November 12, 1866, to a peasant family in the village of Cuiheng, Xiangshan county , Guangzhou prefecture, Guangdong province (26 km or 16 miles north of Macau), not Hawaii, as the document affirms.  

It was also published that Maya Soetoro, Obama’s sister, has a Hawaiian 'Certification of Live Birth' on file too and she was born in Jakarta, Indonesia. You can be born anywhere and get a HI COLB (Certification of Live Birth)..

  2) What kind of form is on file for Obama?  If it is a COLB (Certification of Live Birth) and not a long form birth record  - this is a record of a foreign birth!

  3) What hospital was Obama born in? You would think the Obama lovers would want to know to enable them to erect a monument there.  Wouldn't that hospital be considered an historic place? Oddly enough, even the White House will not state the hospital where Obama was born at.  Kapiolani  stated they had a letter from Obama stating he was born there, but recently removed the letter and scrubbed their site.  They did publish it in their printed newsletter, however.

Kapiolani Hospital now states the letter is real after they pulled it! However the Obama Administration still refuses to answer the question.

  4) Who was the doctor? Wouldn't he be a main figure in such an historical event?

  5) Who was listed as the Father? It is rumored that family friend and known communist activist, Frank Marshal Davis, is suspected to be the Father.

The statement made by the Hawaiian official failed to answer these questions and failed to resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation.  Millions of people across the country have a right to know the truth about Obama’s birth and his qualifications for the office of the President of the United States.

Spokeswoman Janice Okubo stated, "The state Department of Health no longer issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past." Okubo explained that the Health Department went paperless in 2001.  "At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting of information about births transferred electronically from hospitals to the department. The electronic record of the birth is what the Health Department now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests." 

7/24/2009   CNN's President Jon Klein was quoted as saying that he asked CNN researchers to dig into the question of why Obama couldn't produce the original birth certificate. The researchers contacted the Hawaii Health Dept. and confirmed that paper documents were discarded in 2001 when the department went paperless. That reportedly includes Obama's original birth certificate.

Hawaii Records dated June 27, 2009, stated that they still keep the original documents on file, but require a judge's signature to release.

So it seems the Obama Administration is now trying to cover up the fact or mislead people into thinking that Hawaii doesn't have the original documents on file even though Hawaiian officials have stated that they will release originals with an order from a Judge. Hopefully Judge Carter will soon issue a subpoena for the documents for the Keyes v. Obama case.

Actually that is not true.  Read what was actually stated:  On October 31, 2008, the statement of Hawaii's  Department of  Health Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino,  was carefully worded when she said, "She had  personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health had Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

This very important requirement in the U.S. Constitution requiring that a U.S. President be ‘natural born’ on U.S. soil is one of the 'wisest requirements' specified by our forefathers.  They put it in there for a very good reason . .  it was to prevent those with foreign interests and loyalties from corrupting our government.  (Think a moment about Obama's peculiar un-American  behavior todate).

The Founders required the President to be a 'Natural Born Citizen' to help ensure that the person holding the top position of the Executive branch would have  unquestionable and unwavering loyalty to the United States of America.

The term natural born citizen was first codified in the legal reference book, 'Law of Nations', in 1758 which was used by John Jay who later became the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.  Jay, considered the outstanding legal scholar of his time, had the 'natural born citizen' clause inserted into the U.S. Constitution via a letter he wrote to George Washington, the leader of the Constitutional Convention.

The official copies of the THIRD U.S. Congress (1795) margin notes state: "Former act repealed. 1790. ch. 3."  - referencing the FIRST U.S. Congress (1790).

The actual text of the THIRD CONGRESS in 1795 states, "...children of citizens (plural). . . both parents of the United States . . ..shall be considered citizens of the United States provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States..." (THIRD CONGRESS Session II. Ch.21. 1795, Approved January 29, 1795, pp. 414-415. Document margin note: "How children shall obtain citizenship through their parents" Document margin note: "Former Act repealed 1790 ch.3.")

"...children of citizens (plural - both parents) of the United States...shall be considered as natural born citizens of the United States provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States..." (FIRST CONGRESS Session II Ch.4 1790, Approved March 26, 1790, pp. 103-104. Document margin note: "Their children residing here, deemed citizens." Document margin note: "Also, children of citizens born beyond sea, & c. Exceptions."

The actual text of the Constitution from the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention, 1774 -1789 and subsequent official printings of the Constitution of the United States of American: Article II Section 1 Clause 5 states,

"No person, except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President…"

From the 'Law of Nations': "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society can not exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as a matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. THE COUNTRY OF THE FATHERS IS THEREFORE THAT OF THE CHILDREN."

Now apply that to Obama's Father being a 'Kenyan'.

John Jay wrote: "Permit me to hint whether it would be wise and reasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen."

Using Adolf Hitler as an example:  "He was not a 'natural born' German born citizen. He was actually born in Austria. Having been to both those countries, I can personally attest to the great difference between Germans and Austrians. There are still many people who believe that had there been a similar requirement or law in Germany to our Constitution requirement for President (or Chancellor or leader) to be born on the land of the country, that WWII would not have occurred as it did and countless millions would not have died. Hitler completely ruined Europe . . . especially Germany. He pushed its people and their military forces to the brink of destruction even when everyone (including himself) knew that there could never be a victory for Germany. Why? Well, many feel it was because he was not a German.  In truth, he was an Austrian and therefore he didn't care about the German people or about Germany and all of her treasures, cities, etc." 

Although Hitler had an 84% approval rating with the public, due to the devastating economic situation and his charismatic oratorical skills (sound similar to Obama?) the National Socialists did not have an overwhelming majority in the Reichstag. They simply were the largest party at the time in the German Parliament. Therefore, no other party was able to oppose their legislative pull.  In a similar situation we wouldn't  be protected.

Many question BHO’s allegiances and patriotism by his refusal to wear the U.S. Flag lapel pin, his  refusal to salute the American Flag during the Anthem, canceling a scheduled Anthem at at least one of his events, and spending a lot of $$$ to repaint his campaign aircraft, removing the U.S. Flag from the tail fin.  He also cancelled a scheduled visit to our injured troops in Germany.

BHO visited Kenya as a Senator and endorsed the socialist party candidate,   Odinga, in their national presidential elections. He did this because Odinga was/is his friend and fellow Luo tribesman and cousin.  He belonged to the same tribe as BHO and his father. Worth mentioning is that hundreds of citizens were killed by Odinga's men when Odinga lost the election.

Case Law regarding 'Natural Born Citizen';

Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168

'At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents (plural) who were its citizens (plural), became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents (plural), within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens "     Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168.

U. S. v Wong Kim Ark (1898)   The court thoroughly discussed 'natural born citizen' and Justice Gray quoted from Minor v. Happersett

The cases importance is that it is the first case decided by the Supreme Court that attempts to explain the meaning of 'natural born citizen' under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Natural born citizen is similar to the meaning of what a natural born subject is under Common Law in England.  It is why the framers of our Constitution specifically included a grandfather clause (natural born Citizen or a Citizen of the United States) at the time of adopting the Constitution.  They needed to 'grandfather' themselves to enable them to be president since they were all British subjects. The holding in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark states that Wong Kim Ark is a native born citizen and not natural born. If you look at the fact of Wong Kim Ark being born in San Francisco, CA, of foreign (Chinese) parents, therefore was not 'natural born'.

Perkins v. Elg's (1939) . . .  Its importance is that it actually gives examples of who a 'natural born citizen' of the U.S. is, who a 'citizen' of the U.S. is, and who a 'native born citizen' of the U. S. is. In this case, the U. S. Supreme Court decided the same as in prior case laws that a 'natural born citizen' is a person who is born of two U.S. citizen parents (plural) and born in the mainland of U.S.

Citizen: On cross appeals, the Court of Appeals affirmed the decree, 69 App.D.C. 175, 99 F.2d 408. Certiorari was granted, December 5, 1938, 305 U.S. 591, 59 S.Ct. 245, 83 L.Ed.  On her birth in New York, the plaintiff became a citizen of the United States. Civil Rights Act of 1866: Ms. Elg was found to be a 'citizen' because she was born in the mainland USA (New York)

Native Born citizen: This principle was clearly stated by Attorney General Edwards Pierrepont in his letter of advice to the Secretary of State Hamilton Fish, in Steinkauler's Case, 1875, 15 Op.Atty.Gen. 15. Steinkauler, a Prussian subject by birth, who emigrated to the United States in 1848 and was naturalized in 1854, and had a son who was born in St. Louis the following year. 4 years later Steinkauler returned to Germany taking this child and became domiciled at Weisbaden where they continuously resided. When the son reached 20 years of age the German Government called upon him to report for military duty but his father then requested intervention of the American Legation on the grounds that his son was a 'native born' citizen of the United States'. On reviewing the pertinent points in the case, including the Naturalization Treaty of 1868 with North Germany, 15 Stat. 615, the Attorney General reached the following conclusion: "Young Steinkauler is a native born American citizen."  Mr. Steinkauler was found to be a 'native born citizen' because he was born in the mainland USA (St. Louis)

A person can be a 'citizen' under the following circumstances:

1) Person was born of one citizen parent (Obama) or

2) Person was born in the US mainland ('anchor babies') or

3) Person was naturalized like Arnold Schwarzenegger -  ( who most know he is not eligible for President). 

To be a 'natural born citizen'  the person MUST be born in the US mainland of two US citizen parents. (plural)

Obama is at best a citizen, but NOT a 'natural born citizen' even IF he was born in the State of Hawaii.  He had only ONE U.S. citizen parent. (singular)

___________________________

There is also evidence that BHO's Selective Service Registration Form is also a forgery. Failure to register would prove further ineligibility for any job in the Executive Branch of Government and BHO would not even be eligible for a job a the Post Office!

Call your representatives, attend 'tea parties', events, or peaceful protests, and if you cannot do any of those things then please support those who are tirelessly working 16+ hours daily to try to preserve YOUR rights and the rights of your children and future generations by making donations. If you cannot get involved yourself, then your donation will help those who are working hard to get things done!

Email:  Donate(AT)ObamaNotQualified.com to get an immediate automatic response with information on how and where to send your generous donations to show your support, which will be most appreciated. Thank you!

"I am formally asking you to bring a commission of treason against Mr. Barack Husain [sic] Obama," wrote Accornero in the email, posted by Blue Hampshire and obtained by The Huffington Post. "We have a President who allows our borders to be violated by illegals of any country while we are at war. He allows them work permits, access to our services and when apprehended by law enforcement refuses to have them jailed or deported."

In an interview with The Huffington Post, Accornero said he had to act on the injustices he feels the Obama administration is performing.

"I've been contemplating this for awhile and just been getting fed up with what's going on in Washington and what the President is doing to our country," he said. "I wrote a few letters into the local paper and I sent it to Congressman [Frank] Guinta and it just falls on deaf ears."

Accornero said he was surprised that his charge of treason against the President of the United States has gotten so much attention. He said this isn't about him but about average citizens without a voice.

"I'm kind of overwhelmed that this thing has taken off like it has," he said. "But I have received hundreds of calls from people throughout the country expressing their dissatisfaction. The only reason I got attention is because I have 'representative' in front of my name, which is kind of unfair, because every American should have a right to challenge their President and their government."

Yet while his charge may be starting to get attention, it doesn't appear that his call for a formal commission is going anywhere. A spokesperson for New Hampshire State House Speaker Bill O'Brien (R-Mount Vernon) did not return a request for comment to The Huffington Post.